Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6850

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2175not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.05no data
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Griffin (2008−2009)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)December 2008 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataS1
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme (Desktop) QX6850 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX6850 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, on the other hand, has 271.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX6850 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX6850 is a desktop processor while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6850 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6850
Core 2 Extreme QX6850
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 52 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6850 or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.