Celeron G3902E vs Core 2 Extreme QX6800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release dateApril 2007 (17 years ago)2 January 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.93 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz1.6 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate1066 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data16
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB
L2 cache8 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB2 MB
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size2x 143 mm298.57 mm2
Maximum core temperature65 °Cno data
Number of transistors582 million1750 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketLGA775no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3LPDDR3-1866
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Extreme QX6800 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron G3902E, on the other hand, has a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 420% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Extreme QX6800 is a desktop processor while Celeron G3902E is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6800 and Celeron G3902E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6800
Core 2 Extreme QX6800
Intel Celeron G3902E
Celeron G3902E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 10 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron G3902E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6800 or Celeron G3902E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.