Pentium E5800 vs Core 2 Extreme QX6700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Extreme QX6700
4 cores / 4 threads, 130 Watt
1.37
+80.3%

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 outperforms Pentium E5800 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium E5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21442557
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.945.38
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Extreme (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameKentsfield (2007)Wolfdale (2008−2010)
Release dateno data28 November 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$68
Current price$312 $66 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Pentium E5800 has 83% better value for money than Core 2 Extreme QX6700.

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium E5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (shared)
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data82 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data74 °C
Number of transistorsno data228 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium E5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium E5800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium E5800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium E5800 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium E5800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium E5800.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 1.37
+80.3%
Pentium E5800 0.76

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 outperforms Pentium E5800 by 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 2118
+80.9%
Pentium E5800 1171

Core 2 Extreme QX6700 outperforms Pentium E5800 by 81% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.37 0.76
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

The Core 2 Extreme QX6700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium E5800 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Extreme QX6700 and Pentium E5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Core 2 Extreme QX6700
Intel Pentium E5800
Pentium E5800

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 45 votes

Rate Core 2 Extreme QX6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 375 votes

Rate Pentium E5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Extreme QX6700 or Pentium E5800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.