Duron 800 vs Core 2 Duo U7700
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo U7700 and Duron 800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3143 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD Duron |
Power efficiency | 2.56 | no data |
Architecture codename | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) | Spitfire (2000−2001) |
Release date | 27 July 2006 (18 years ago) | 17 October 2000 (24 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $170 |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo U7700 and Duron 800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 1.33 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.33 GHz | 0.8 GHz |
Bus type | no data | FSB |
Bus rate | 533 MHz | 200 MT/s |
Multiplier | no data | 8 |
L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 64 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
Die size | 143 mm2 | 105.68 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 291 Million | 25 million |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.8V-0.975V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo U7700 and Duron 800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | P | A |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and Duron 800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo U7700 and Duron 800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | - | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and Duron 800 are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo U7700 and Duron 800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 Depends on motherboard |
Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 27 July 2006 | 17 October 2000 |
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 180 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Duo U7700 has an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 176.9% more advanced lithography process, and 250% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo U7700 and Duron 800. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo U7700 is a notebook processor while Duron 800 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo U7700 and Duron 800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.