Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs Core 2 Duo U7600
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 7 9800X3D outperforms Core 2 Duo U7600 by a whopping 11235% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3485 | 292 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 37 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 45.87 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
| Power efficiency | no data | 20.26 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | no data | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Merom-2048 (2006−2008) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| Release date | 27 July 2006 (19 years ago) | 7 November 2024 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $479 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo U7600 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 5.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 533 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 96 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | 70.6 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 291 Million | 8,315 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| VID voltage range | 0.8V-0.975V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo U7600 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | PBGA479 | AM5 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo U7600 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo U7600 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo U7600 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo U7600 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon Graphics |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo U7600 and Ryzen 7 9800X3D.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 24 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
wPrime 32
wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.20 | 22.67 |
| Recency | 27 July 2006 | 7 November 2024 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 120 Watt |
Core 2 Duo U7600 has 1100% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 7 9800X3D, on the other hand, has a 11235% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 18 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.
The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo U7600 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo U7600 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
