Turion II M500 vs Core 2 Duo T9900

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Duo T9900
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.76
+38.2%
Turion II M500
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.55

Core 2 Duo T9900 outperforms Turion II M500 by 38% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion II M500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25182696
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD Turion II
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Caspian (2009)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)10 September 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$530no data
Current price$112 (0.2x MSRP)$100

Technical specs

Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion II M500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.06 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz2.2 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.05V-1.2125Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion II M500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478Socket S1 (s1g3) 638-pin
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion II M500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNowno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion II M500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion II M500 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T9900 0.76
+38.2%
Turion II M500 0.55

Core 2 Duo T9900 outperforms Turion II M500 by 38% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo T9900 3538
+89.7%
Turion II M500 1865

Core 2 Duo T9900 outperforms Turion II M500 by 90% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T9900 7094
+97.5%
Turion II M500 3591

Core 2 Duo T9900 outperforms Turion II M500 by 98% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T9900 2787
+58.7%
Turion II M500 1756

Core 2 Duo T9900 outperforms Turion II M500 by 59% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Core 2 Duo T9900 25.1
+38.5%
Turion II M500 34.76

Turion II M500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9900 by 38% in wPrime 32.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.76 0.55
Recency 1 April 2009 10 September 2009

The Core 2 Duo T9900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion II M500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9900 and Turion II M500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T9900
Core 2 Duo T9900
AMD Turion II M500
Turion II M500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 115 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 42 votes

Rate Turion II M500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T9900 or Turion II M500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.