Atom N280 vs Core 2 Duo T9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T9800 and Atom N280 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2530not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Atom
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 February 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$530no data
Current price$248 (0.5x MSRP)$229

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T9800 and Atom N280 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.66 GHz
Boost clock speed2.92 GHz1.66 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz667 MHz
L1 cache128 KB56 KB
L2 cache6 MB512 KB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Million47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9800 and Atom N280 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA479,PGA478PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9800 and Atom N280. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-no data
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9800 and Atom N280 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9800 and Atom N280 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9800 and Atom N280. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T9800 1216
+675%
Atom N280 157

Core 2 Duo T9800 outperforms Atom N280 by 675% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo T9800 3633
+541%
Atom N280 567

Core 2 Duo T9800 outperforms Atom N280 by 541% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T9800 6839
+680%
Atom N280 877

Core 2 Duo T9800 outperforms Atom N280 by 680% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T9800 2626
+418%
Atom N280 507

Core 2 Duo T9800 outperforms Atom N280 by 418% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2009 1 February 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 2 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T9800 and Atom N280. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9800 and Atom N280, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
Core 2 Duo T9800
Intel Atom N280
Atom N280

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 65 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 28 votes

Rate Atom N280 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T9800 or Atom N280, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.