A6-3410MX vs Core 2 Duo T9800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T9800
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.79

A6-3410MX outperforms Core 2 Duo T9800 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T9800 and A6-3410MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25302496
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD A-Series
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)14 June 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$530no data
Current price$248 (0.5x MSRP)$15.49

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T9800 and A6-3410MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.93 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.92 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9800 and A6-3410MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478FS1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9800 and A6-3410MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G, DDR3(L)-1333 Memory Controller
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9800 and A6-3410MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9800 and A6-3410MX are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9800 and A6-3410MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6520G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T9800 0.79
A6-3410MX 0.82
+3.8%

A6-3410MX outperforms Core 2 Duo T9800 by 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T9800 1216
A6-3410MX 1263
+3.9%

A6-3410MX outperforms Core 2 Duo T9800 by 4% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T9800 320
+42.2%
A6-3410MX 225

Core 2 Duo T9800 outperforms A6-3410MX by 42% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T9800 597
A6-3410MX 637
+6.7%

A6-3410MX outperforms Core 2 Duo T9800 by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo T9800 3633
+113%
A6-3410MX 1707

Core 2 Duo T9800 outperforms A6-3410MX by 113% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T9800 6839
+22.8%
A6-3410MX 5568

Core 2 Duo T9800 outperforms A6-3410MX by 23% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T9800 2626
+8.8%
A6-3410MX 2414

Core 2 Duo T9800 outperforms A6-3410MX by 9% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.79 0.82
Recency 1 January 2009 14 June 2011
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 45 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo T9800 and A6-3410MX.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9800 and A6-3410MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T9800
Core 2 Duo T9800
AMD A6-3410MX
A6-3410MX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 65 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 42 votes

Rate A6-3410MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T9800 or A6-3410MX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.