Atom x5-Z8500 vs Core 2 Duo T9600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T9600
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.70

Atom x5-Z8500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9600 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26172517
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo5x Intel Atom
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Cherry Trail (2016)
Release date15 July 2008 (15 years ago)2 March 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$316no data
Current price$152 (0.5x MSRP)$191

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.24 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L2 cache6 MB2 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C90 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.05V-1.2125Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketBGA479,BGA956,PBGA479,PGA478UTFCBGA1380
Power consumption (TDP)35 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protectionno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data600 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data3840x2160
Max resolution over eDPno data2560x1600

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data2
USB revisionno data3.0
Number of USB portsno data3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T9600 0.70
Atom x5-Z8500 0.80
+14.3%

Atom x5-Z8500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9600 by 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo T9600 1079
Atom x5-Z8500 1236
+14.6%

Atom x5-Z8500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T9600 by 15% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T9600 341
+101%
Atom x5-Z8500 170

Core 2 Duo T9600 outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 101% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo T9600 565
+15.5%
Atom x5-Z8500 489

Core 2 Duo T9600 outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 16% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo T9600 3107
+166%
Atom x5-Z8500 1166

Core 2 Duo T9600 outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 166% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T9600 5801
+62.8%
Atom x5-Z8500 3563

Core 2 Duo T9600 outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 63% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo T9600 2517
+26.4%
Atom x5-Z8500 1991

Core 2 Duo T9600 outperforms Atom x5-Z8500 by 26% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.80
Recency 15 July 2008 2 March 2015
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm

The Atom x5-Z8500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T9600 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9600 and Atom x5-Z8500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T9600
Core 2 Duo T9600
Intel Atom x5-Z8500
Atom x5-Z8500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 159 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 15 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T9600 or Atom x5-Z8500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.