Athlon X2 450 vs Core 2 Duo T9550

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T9550
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
1.17
+39.3%

Core 2 Duo T9550 outperforms Athlon X2 450 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T9550 and Athlon X2 450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking23392548
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Kaveri (2014−2015)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)31 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$316no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T9550 and Athlon X2 450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.66 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB128K
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size107 mm2245 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors410 Million2,411 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range1.05V-1.212Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T9550 and Athlon X2 450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478FM2+
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T9550 and Athlon X2 450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T9550 and Athlon X2 450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T9550 and Athlon X2 450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T9550 and Athlon X2 450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-1866

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T9550 and Athlon X2 450.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T9550 1.17
+39.3%
Athlon X2 450 0.84

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T9550 1804
+39.3%
Athlon X2 450 1295

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.84
Recency 1 January 2009 31 July 2014
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Duo T9550 has a 39.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Athlon X2 450, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Core 2 Duo T9550 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T9550 is a notebook processor while Athlon X2 450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T9550 and Athlon X2 450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T9550
Core 2 Duo T9550
AMD Athlon X2 450
Athlon X2 450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 82 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 5 votes

Rate Athlon X2 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T9550 or Athlon X2 450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.