Xeon E5-2698B V3 vs Core 2 Duo T8300

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T8300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.84
Xeon E5-2698B V3
2015
16 cores / 32 threads, 135 Watt
9.27
+1004%

Xeon E5-2698B V3 outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by a whopping 1004% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2774929
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.012.90
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
Release date10 January 2008 (17 years ago)January 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache40 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size107 mm2356 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data88 °C
Number of transistors410 Million2,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8300 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketBGA479,PGA4782011-3
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Xeon E5-2698B V3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Xeon E5-2698B V3 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Xeon E5-2698B V3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2133

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Xeon E5-2698B V3.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Duo T8300 0.84
Xeon E5-2698B V3 9.27
+1004%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T8300 1472
Samples: 595
Xeon E5-2698B V3 16287
+1006%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.84 9.27
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 135 Watt

Core 2 Duo T8300 has 285.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2698B V3, on the other hand, has a 1003.6% higher aggregate performance score, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 104.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Intel Xeon E5-2698B V3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T8300 is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2698B V3 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Xeon E5-2698B V3
Xeon E5-2698B V3

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 292 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2698B V3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo T8300 and Xeon E5-2698B V3, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.