Celeron M 333 vs Core 2 Duo T8300

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron M 333 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2512not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoCeleron M
Power efficiency2.51no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Banias (2003)
Release date10 January 2008 (16 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron M 333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz0.9 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz400 MHz
L2 cache3 MBno data
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron M 333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA479,PGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron M 333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron M 333 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron M 333 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 5 Watt

Core 2 Duo T8300 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

Celeron M 333, on the other hand, has 600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron M 333. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T8300 and Celeron M 333, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Core 2 Duo T8300
Intel Celeron M 333
Celeron M 333

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 265 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 7 votes

Rate Celeron M 333 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T8300 or Celeron M 333, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.