Pentium SU2700 vs Core 2 Duo T6600

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T6600 and Pentium SU2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2874not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Pentium
Power efficiency1.35no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)2 June 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T6600 and Pentium SU2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
Number of transistors410 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T6600 and Pentium SU2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478Intel BGA 956
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6600 and Pentium SU2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T6600 and Pentium SU2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6600 and Pentium SU2700 are enumerated here.

VT-x--

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T6600 and Pentium SU2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T6600 793
+248%
Pentium SU2700 228

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T6600 259
+82.4%
Pentium SU2700 142

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T6600 407
+179%
Pentium SU2700 146

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo T6600 2355
+85.7%
Pentium SU2700 1268

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T6600 1947
+233%
Pentium SU2700 584

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo T6600 71.1
+88.5%
Pentium SU2700 134

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2009 2 June 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 10 Watt

Core 2 Duo T6600 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Pentium SU2700, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, and 250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T6600 and Pentium SU2700. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6600 and Pentium SU2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
Core 2 Duo T6600
Intel Pentium SU2700
Pentium SU2700

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 336 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Pentium SU2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T6600 or Pentium SU2700, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.