A6-3500 vs Core 2 Duo T6600

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T6600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.52

A6-3500 outperforms Core 2 Duo T6600 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T6600 and A6-3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28732531
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency1.351.30
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Llano (2011−2012)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)17 August 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T6600 and A6-3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)3 (Tri-Core)
Threads23
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2228 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T6600 and A6-3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FM1
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T6600 and A6-3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T6600 and A6-3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T6600 and A6-3500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T6600 and A6-3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataRadeon HD 6530D

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T6600 0.52
A6-3500 0.93
+78.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T6600 793
A6-3500 1420
+79.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo T6600 257
A6-3500 262
+1.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo T6600 403
A6-3500 628
+55.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 0.93
Recency 6 January 2009 17 August 2011
Physical cores 2 3
Threads 2 3
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Core 2 Duo T6600 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

A6-3500, on the other hand, has a 78.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

The A6-3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo T6600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo T6600 is a notebook processor while A6-3500 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T6600 and A6-3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T6600
Core 2 Duo T6600
AMD A6-3500
A6-3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 336 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 112 votes

Rate A6-3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T6600 or A6-3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.