Turion 64 MK-38 vs Core 2 Duo T5900
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo T5900 outperforms Turion 64 MK-38 by an impressive 78% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T5900 and Turion 64 MK-38 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3010 | 3205 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Turion 64 |
| Power efficiency | 1.12 | 0.71 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Richmond |
| Release date | 1 October 2008 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T5900 and Turion 64 MK-38 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.2 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T5900 and Turion 64 MK-38 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | Socket P | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 31 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5900 and Turion 64 MK-38. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| AMT | + | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo T5900 and Turion 64 MK-38 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.41 | 0.23 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 31 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T5900 has a 78.3% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.
Turion 64 MK-38, on the other hand, has 12.9% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo T5900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Turion 64 MK-38 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5900 and Turion 64 MK-38, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
