Celeron M 410 vs Core 2 Duo T5550
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo T5550 and Celeron M 410 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Celeron M |
Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Yonah (2005−2006) |
Release date | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo T5550 and Celeron M 410 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.46 GHz |
Bus rate | 667 MHz | 533 MHz |
L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 291 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo T5550 and Celeron M 410 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | PPGA478 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 34 Watt | 27 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo T5550 and Celeron M 410. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
ECC memory support | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
Threads | 2 | 1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 34 Watt | 27 Watt |
Core 2 Duo T5550 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Celeron M 410, on the other hand, has 25.9% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo T5550 and Celeron M 410. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5550 and Celeron M 410, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.