Mobile Sempron 3500+ vs Core 2 Duo T5250

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo T5250
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.35
+119%
Mobile Sempron 3500+
1 core / 1 thread, 25 Watt
0.16

Core 2 Duo T5250 outperforms Mobile Sempron 3500+ by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo T5250 and Mobile Sempron 3500+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30633290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesCore 2 DuoMobile Sempron
Power efficiency0.970.61
Architecture codenameMerom-2048 (2006−2008)Keene
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo T5250 and Mobile Sempron 3500+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed1.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate667 MHz800 MHz
L3 cache2 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.075V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo T5250 and Mobile Sempron 3500+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketPPGA478no data
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo T5250 and Mobile Sempron 3500+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo T5250 and Mobile Sempron 3500+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo T5250 and Mobile Sempron 3500+ are enumerated here.

VT-x-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo T5250 0.35
+119%
Mobile Sempron 3500+ 0.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo T5250 556
+115%
Mobile Sempron 3500+ 259

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo T5250 1298
+84.4%
Mobile Sempron 3500+ 704

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 25 Watt

Core 2 Duo T5250 has a 118.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Mobile Sempron 3500+, on the other hand, has 40% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo T5250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Sempron 3500+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo T5250 and Mobile Sempron 3500+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo T5250
Core 2 Duo T5250
AMD Mobile Sempron 3500+
Mobile Sempron 3500+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 26 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T5250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 7 votes

Rate Mobile Sempron 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo T5250 or Mobile Sempron 3500+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.