E2-2000 vs Core 2 Duo SU9300
Aggregate performance score
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SU9300 and E2-2000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3105 | 3106 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD E-Series |
Power efficiency | 2.93 | 1.63 |
Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Zacate (2011−2013) |
Release date | 20 August 2008 (16 years ago) | 6 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SU9300 and E2-2000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 1.75 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
L2 cache | 3 MB | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
Die size | 107 mm2 | 75 mm2 |
Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SU9300 and E2-2000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
Socket | BGA956 | FT1 BGA 413-Ball |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 18 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU9300 and E2-2000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V |
PowerNow | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SU9300 and E2-2000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU9300 and E2-2000 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU9300 and E2-2000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon HD 7340 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 20 August 2008 | 6 January 2013 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 18 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU9300 has 80% lower power consumption.
E2-2000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 12.5% more advanced lithography process.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo SU9300 and E2-2000.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU9300 and E2-2000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.