Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ by a substantial 30% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3062 | 3136 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 3.33 | 0.73 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Oakville (2003−2004) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | August 2004 (20 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128K |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512K |
| L3 cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | no data |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 193 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.35 | 0.27 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 35 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU7300 has a 29.6% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 250% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
