GX-210JA vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms GX-210JA by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3061 | 3305 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD |
| Power efficiency | 3.31 | 2.52 |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Temash (2013) |
| Release date | 1 September 2009 (15 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 1.3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 3 MB Intel® Smart Cache | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | BGA956 | FT3 BGA |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1 | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SU7300 and GX-210JA technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and GX-210JA are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.35 | 0.16 |
| Recency | 1 September 2009 | 23 May 2013 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 6 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SU7300 has a 118.8% higher aggregate performance score.
GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 60.7% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
