Celeron N2805 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SU7300
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 10 Watt
0.35
+66.7%
Celeron N2805
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.21

Core 2 Duo SU7300 outperforms Celeron N2805 by an impressive 67% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30663220
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.345.00
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Bay Trail-M (2013−2014)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)11 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.3 GHz1.46 GHz
Boost clock speed1.3 GHz1.46 GHz
Bus rate800 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data56K (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache3 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm22 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C80 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt4.3 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
Smart Connectno data+
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics for Intel Atom Processor Z3700 Series
Graphics max frequencyno data667 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data4
USB revisionno data3.0 and 2.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 0.35
+66.7%
Celeron N2805 0.21

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1496
+97.9%
Celeron N2805 756

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 2813
+96.7%
Celeron N2805 1430

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 1178
+33.1%
Celeron N2805 885

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 61.3
+39%
Celeron N2805 85.2

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 72
+64.1%
Celeron N2805 44

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 39
+61.3%
Celeron N2805 24

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Core 2 Duo SU7300 0.1
+25%
Celeron N2805 0.1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.21
Recency 1 September 2009 11 September 2013
Chip lithography 45 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 4 Watt

Core 2 Duo SU7300 has a 66.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Celeron N2805, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 104.5% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo SU7300 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron N2805 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SU7300 and Celeron N2805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300
Core 2 Duo SU7300
Intel Celeron N2805
Celeron N2805

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 42 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SU7300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 101 vote

Rate Celeron N2805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SU7300 or Celeron N2805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.