Phenom II X3 705e vs Core 2 Duo SP9600
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X3 705e outperforms Core 2 Duo SP9600 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Phenom II X3 705e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2587 | 2527 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 4.09 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Heka (2009−2010) |
| Release date | 1 March 2009 (15 years ago) | June 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $316 | $152 |
| Current price | no data | $34 (0.2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Phenom II X3 705e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus support | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 6 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 107 mm2 | 258 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 410 Million | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Phenom II X3 705e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA479,BGA956,PBGA479 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Phenom II X3 705e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Phenom II X3 705e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Phenom II X3 705e are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Phenom II X3 705e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.73 | 0.79 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 3 |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Cost | $316 | $152 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Phenom II X3 705e.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo SP9600 is a notebook processor while Phenom II X3 705e is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SP9600 and Phenom II X3 705e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
