3020e vs Core 2 Duo SP9300

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo SP9300
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.64

3020e outperforms Core 2 Duo SP9300 by a whopping 148% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo SP9300 and 3020e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27772119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency2.3324.16
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Dali (Zen) (2020)
Release date20 August 2008 (16 years ago)4 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$284no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo SP9300 and 3020e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.26 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.26 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cache6 MB1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °C105 °C
Number of transistors410 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range1.05V - 1.15Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo SP9300 and 3020e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketBGA956FT5
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP9300 and 3020e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo SP9300 and 3020e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SP9300 and 3020e are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SP9300 and 3020e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo SP9300 0.64
3020e 1.59
+148%

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Core 2 Duo SP9300 52.68
3020e 29
+81.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 1.59
Recency 20 August 2008 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 6 Watt

3020e has a 148.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The 3020e is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SP9300 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SP9300 and 3020e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300
Core 2 Duo SP9300
AMD 3020e
3020e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo SP9300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 811 votes

Rate 3020e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo SP9300 or 3020e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.