GX-210JA vs Core 2 Duo SP7500
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo SP7500 outperforms GX-210JA by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SP7500 and GX-210JA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 3052 | 3292 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD |
Power efficiency | 1.66 | 2.52 |
Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Temash (2013) |
Release date | 15 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 23 May 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SP7500 and GX-210JA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1 GHz |
Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SP7500 and GX-210JA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | no data | FT3 BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and GX-210JA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | 86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX |
AES-NI | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and GX-210JA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.35 | 0.16 |
Recency | 15 January 2008 | 23 May 2013 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 28 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 6 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SP7500 has a 118.8% higher aggregate performance score.
GX-210JA, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 132.1% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo SP7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the GX-210JA in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SP7500 and GX-210JA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.