FX-4350 vs Core 2 Duo SP7500
Aggregate performance score
FX-4350 outperforms Core 2 Duo SP7500 by a whopping 497% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo SP7500 and FX-4350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3069 | 1888 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.66 | 1.58 |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 15 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 29 April 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SP7500 and FX-4350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 4.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 4096 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.275 V - Max: 1.4 V |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SP7500 and FX-4350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and FX-4350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and FX-4350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and FX-4350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and FX-4350.
| PCIe version | no data | n/a |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.35 | 2.09 |
| Recency | 15 January 2008 | 29 April 2013 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 125 Watt |
Core 2 Duo SP7500 has 525% lower power consumption.
FX-4350, on the other hand, has a 497.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.
The FX-4350 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo SP7500 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo SP7500 is a notebook processor while FX-4350 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo SP7500 and FX-4350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
