Athlon II P320 vs Core 2 Duo SP7500
Aggregate performance score
Athlon II P320 outperforms Core 2 Duo SP7500 by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3348 | 3235 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | AMD Athlon II |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Merom (2006−2008) | Champlain (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 15 January 2008 (17 years ago) | 12 May 2010 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo SP7500 and Athlon II P320 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo SP7500 and Athlon II P320 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | no data | S1g4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 MB | 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo SP7500 and Athlon II P320. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | SSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVM |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core
Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.31 | 0.40 |
| Recency | 15 January 2008 | 12 May 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 4 Watt | 1 Watt |
Athlon II P320 has a 29% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.
The AMD Athlon II P320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
