Xeon Gold 5412U vs Core 2 Duo P9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P9700
2009, $348
2 cores / 2 threads, 28 Watt
0.67
Xeon Gold 5412U
2023, $1,113
24 cores / 48 threads, 185 Watt
29.26
+4267%

Xeon Gold 5412U outperforms Core 2 Duo P9700 by a whopping 4267% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2960190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0228.17
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency2.5716.96
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelIntel
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date2 June 2009 (16 years ago)10 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348$1,113

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5412U has 140750% better value for money than Core 2 Duo P9700.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P9700 and Xeon Gold 5412U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache45 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.012V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P9700 and Xeon Gold 5412U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPGA478FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Xeon Gold 5412U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P9700 and Xeon Gold 5412U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Xeon Gold 5412U are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Xeon Gold 5412U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR5-4400
Maximum memory sizeno data4 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Xeon Gold 5412U.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data80

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Duo P9700 0.67
Xeon Gold 5412U 29.26
+4267%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P9700 1178
Samples: 125
Xeon Gold 5412U 51599
+4280%
Samples: 17

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 29.26
Recency 2 June 2009 10 January 2023
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 185 Watt

Core 2 Duo P9700 has 560.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 5412U, on the other hand, has a 4267.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads.

The Intel Xeon Gold 5412U is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P9700 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 5412U is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P9700
Core 2 Duo P9700
Intel Xeon Gold 5412U
Xeon Gold 5412U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 43 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 11 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5412U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo P9700 and Xeon Gold 5412U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.