Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 vs Core 2 Duo P9700

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2682not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duo2x AMD Turion Ultra
Power efficiency2.45no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Puma (2008−2009)
Release date2 June 2009 (15 years ago)4 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)2 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.012V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPGA478S1g2
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNow-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR2

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo P9700 374
+80.7%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 207

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo P9700 634
+52%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 417

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo P9700 3425
+81.6%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 1886

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo P9700 6133
+69.7%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 3615

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P9700 2540
+57.8%
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 1610

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 June 2009 4 June 2008
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo P9700 has an age advantage of 11 months, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P9700 and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P9700
Core 2 Duo P9700
AMD Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 40 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 36 votes

Rate Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P9700 or Turion X2 Ultra ZM-84, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.