Athlon 64 FX-62 vs Core 2 Duo P9700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P9700
2009, $348
2 cores / 2 threads, 28 Watt
0.67
+19.6%

Core 2 Duo P9700 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-62 by a significant 20% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29643076
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAthlon 64 (Desktop)
Power efficiency2.57no data
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date2 June 2009 (16 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P9700 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.8 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz1000 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)256 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)1 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million243 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1.012V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P9700 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPGA478AM2
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt2 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P9700 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P9700 and Athlon 64 (Desktop) FX-62. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Core 2 Duo P9700 0.67
+19.6%
Athlon 64 FX-62 0.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Core 2 Duo P9700 1178
+18.6%
Samples: 125
Athlon 64 FX-62 993
Samples: 22

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo P9700 2540
+18.2%
Athlon 64 FX-62 2149

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.67 0.56
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 2 Watt

Core 2 Duo P9700 has a 19.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon 64 FX-62, on the other hand, has 1300% lower power consumption.

The Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 FX-62 in performance tests.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P9700 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 FX-62 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P9700
Core 2 Duo P9700
AMD Athlon 64 FX-62
Athlon 64 FX-62

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 43 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-62 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Core 2 Duo P9700 and Athlon 64 FX-62, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.