A4-4300M vs Core 2 Duo P9600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P9600
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.70
+7.7%

Core 2 Duo P9600 outperforms A4-4300M by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P9600 and A4-4300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking26072659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD A-Series
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$348no data
Current price$139 (0.4x MSRP)$61

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P9600 and A4-4300M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz3 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB96 KB
L2 cache6 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size107 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range1.05V-1.212Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P9600 and A4-4300M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPBGA479,PGA478FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P9600 and A4-4300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P9600 and A4-4300M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P9600 and A4-4300M are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo P9600 and A4-4300M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataunknown

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 7420G

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P9600 0.70
+7.7%
A4-4300M 0.65

Core 2 Duo P9600 outperforms A4-4300M by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo P9600 1088
+8.8%
A4-4300M 1000

Core 2 Duo P9600 outperforms A4-4300M by 9% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P9600 368
+16.5%
A4-4300M 316

Core 2 Duo P9600 outperforms A4-4300M by 16% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P9600 663
+63.7%
A4-4300M 405

Core 2 Duo P9600 outperforms A4-4300M by 64% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Core 2 Duo P9600 2971
+48.8%
A4-4300M 1997

Core 2 Duo P9600 outperforms A4-4300M by 49% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo P9600 5507
+75.2%
A4-4300M 3144

Core 2 Duo P9600 outperforms A4-4300M by 75% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Core 2 Duo P9600 2375
+41%
A4-4300M 1684

Core 2 Duo P9600 outperforms A4-4300M by 41% in 3DMark06 CPU.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.65
Recency 1 January 2009 15 May 2012
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo P9600 and A4-4300M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P9600 and A4-4300M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P9600
Core 2 Duo P9600
AMD A4-4300M
A4-4300M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 28 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P9600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 108 votes

Rate A4-4300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P9600 or A4-4300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.