Pentium III 1333 vs Core 2 Duo P8800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P8800 and Pentium III 1333 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2771not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Power efficiency2.22no data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Tualatin (2000−2002)
Release date1 April 2009 (15 years ago)December 2001 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$241no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P8800 and Pentium III 1333 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB8 KB
L2 cache3 MB256 KB
L3 cache3 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size107 mm280 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data69 °C
Number of transistors410 Million44 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range1V-1.25Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P8800 and Pentium III 1333 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA479,PGA478370
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and Pentium III 1333. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo P8800 and Pentium III 1333 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8800 and Pentium III 1333 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 30 Watt

Core 2 Duo P8800 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 188.9% more advanced lithography process, and 20% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo P8800 and Pentium III 1333. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P8800 is a notebook processor while Pentium III 1333 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P8800 and Pentium III 1333, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P8800
Core 2 Duo P8800
Intel Pentium III 1333
Pentium III 1333

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 25 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P8800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium III 1333 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P8800 or Pentium III 1333, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.