Phenom X4 9100e vs Core 2 Duo P8600
Aggregate performance score
Phenom X4 9100e outperforms Core 2 Duo P8600 by an impressive 57% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3188 | 2903 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.02 | no data |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Core 2 Duo | no data |
| Power efficiency | 0.83 | 0.50 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Architecture codename | Penryn (2008−2011) | Agena (2007−2008) |
| Release date | 15 July 2008 (17 years ago) | March 2008 (18 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $209 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo P8600 and Phenom X4 9100e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 3 MB L2 Cache | 2 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 81 mm2 | 285 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 105 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 274 Million | 450 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 1.05V-1.15V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo P8600 and Phenom X4 9100e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA479,PBGA479,PGA478 | AM2+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo P8600 and Phenom X4 9100e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo P8600 and Phenom X4 9100e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo P8600 and Phenom X4 9100e are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.49 | 0.77 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 65 Watt |
Core 2 Duo P8600 has a 44% more advanced lithography process, and 160% lower power consumption.
Phenom X4 9100e, on the other hand, has a 57% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
The AMD Phenom X4 9100e is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 in performance tests.
Be aware that Core 2 Duo P8600 is a notebook processor while Phenom X4 9100e is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
