Athlon 64 X2 5200+ vs Core 2 Duo P7450

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo P7450
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.51
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.55
+7.8%

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ outperforms Core 2 Duo P7450 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo P7450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking27772739
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.54
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Core 2 Duono data
Architecture codenamePenryn (2008−2011)Windsor (2006−2009)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)September 2006 (17 years ago)
Current price$26 $167

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo P7450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.13 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cache3 MB512K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size107 mm2220 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 Million154 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo P7450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478AM2
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt89 Watt

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo P7450 0.51
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 0.55
+7.8%

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ outperforms Core 2 Duo P7450 by 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo P7450 783
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 844
+7.8%

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ outperforms Core 2 Duo P7450 by 8% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P7450 270
+6.7%
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 253

Core 2 Duo P7450 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by 7% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo P7450 458
+3.6%
Athlon 64 X2 5200+ 442

Core 2 Duo P7450 outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5200+ by 4% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 0.55
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 89 Watt

Core 2 Duo P7450 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 256% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 5200+, on the other hand, has a 7.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo P7450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+.

Be aware that Core 2 Duo P7450 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo P7450 and Athlon 64 X2 5200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo P7450
Core 2 Duo P7450
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo P7450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 300 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo P7450 or Athlon 64 X2 5200+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.