E-240 vs Core 2 Duo E8400

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2538not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.86no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date1 January 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$67 $118

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache6 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die size104 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3 Single-channel

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon HD 6310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E8400 1165
+497%
E-240 195

Core 2 Duo E8400 outperforms E-240 by 497% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E8400 369
+245%
E-240 107

Core 2 Duo E8400 outperforms E-240 by 245% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E8400 615
+454%
E-240 111

Core 2 Duo E8400 outperforms E-240 by 454% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 January 2008 4 January 2011
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Duo E8400 is a desktop processor while E-240 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8400 and E-240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8400
Core 2 Duo E8400
AMD E-240
E-240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2085 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E8400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 51 vote

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8400 or E-240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.