Athlon X2 7850 BE vs Core 2 Duo E8400
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2672 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 1.06 | no data |
Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Kuma (2008−2009) |
Release date | 1 January 2008 (16 years ago) | 28 April 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
Bus rate | 1333 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 6 MB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 104 mm2 | 285 mm2 |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 72 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 410 million | 450 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | LGA775 | AM2+ |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | unknown |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 January 2008 | 28 April 2009 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Core 2 Duo E8400 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.
Athlon X2 7850 BE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8400 and Athlon X2 7850 BE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.