Sempron 140 vs Core 2 Duo E8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E8200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.71
+129%
Sempron 140
2009
1 core / 1 thread, 45 Watt
0.31

Core 2 Duo E8200 outperforms Sempron 140 by a whopping 129% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8200 and Sempron 140 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27143109
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.030.65
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Sargas (2009−2011)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)22 July 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$40

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E8200 and Sempron 140 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz2.7 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache6 MB (shared)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size107 mm2117 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 million234 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8200 and Sempron 140 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Sempron 140. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8200 and Sempron 140 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Sempron 140 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Sempron 140. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Sempron 140.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E8200 0.71
+129%
Sempron 140 0.31

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E8200 1124
+131%
Sempron 140 486

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo E8200 335
+8.1%
Sempron 140 310

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo E8200 527
+66.8%
Sempron 140 316

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.31
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Core 2 Duo E8200 has a 129% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Sempron 140, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Core 2 Duo E8200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Sempron 140 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8200 and Sempron 140, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Core 2 Duo E8200
AMD Sempron 140
Sempron 140

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 131 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 233 votes

Rate Sempron 140 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8200 or Sempron 140, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.