Athlon II X2 215 vs Core 2 Duo E7500

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Core 2 Duo E7500
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.72
+18%
Athlon II X2 215
2009
2 cores / 2 threads
0.61

Core 2 Duo E7500 outperforms Athlon II X2 215 by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E7500 and Athlon II X2 215 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25522645
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.838.66
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Regor (2009−2013)
Release dateJanuary 2009 (15 years ago)October 2009 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$45
Current price$69 $25 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon II X2 215 has 943% better value for money than Core 2 Duo E7500.

Detailed Specifications

Core 2 Duo E7500 and Athlon II X2 215 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed2.93 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz2.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB128 KB
L2 cache3 MB (shared)512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size82 mm2117 mm2
Maximum core temperature74 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)74 °Cno data
Number of transistors228 million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E7500 and Athlon II X2 215 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketLGA775AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7500 and Athlon II X2 215. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E7500 and Athlon II X2 215 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7500 and Athlon II X2 215. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E7500 0.72
+18%
Athlon II X2 215 0.61

Core 2 Duo E7500 outperforms Athlon II X2 215 by 18% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E7500 1131
+17.1%
Athlon II X2 215 966

Core 2 Duo E7500 outperforms Athlon II X2 215 by 17% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E7500 345
+25%
Athlon II X2 215 276

Core 2 Duo E7500 outperforms Athlon II X2 215 by 25% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Core 2 Duo E7500 565
+17.5%
Athlon II X2 215 481

Core 2 Duo E7500 outperforms Athlon II X2 215 by 17% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 0.72 0.61

The Core 2 Duo E7500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 215 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7500 and Athlon II X2 215, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E7500
Core 2 Duo E7500
AMD Athlon II X2 215
Athlon II X2 215

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 937 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E7500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 257 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 215 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E7500 or Athlon II X2 215, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.