Phenom II X3 710 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Aggregate performance score
Phenom II X3 710 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7200 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E7200 and Phenom II X3 710 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2664 | 2372 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.95 | 11.22 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Wolfdale (2008−2010) | Heka (2009−2010) |
| Release date | April 2008 (16 years ago) | February 2009 (15 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $85 |
| Current price | $23 | $17.14 (0.2x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Phenom II X3 710 has 89% better value for money than Core 2 Duo E7200.
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E7200 and Phenom II X3 710 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 3 (Tri-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB (shared) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 82 mm2 | 258 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 74 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 228 million | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E7200 and Phenom II X3 710 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Phenom II X3 710. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E7200 and Phenom II X3 710 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Phenom II X3 710 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | - | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E7200 and Phenom II X3 710. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | DDR3 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Phenom II X3 710 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7200 by 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Phenom II X3 710 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7200 by 56% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Phenom II X3 710 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7200 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Phenom II X3 710 outperforms Core 2 Duo E7200 by 70% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.64 | 1.00 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 3 |
| Threads | 2 | 3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 95 Watt |
The Phenom II X3 710 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E7200 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E7200 and Phenom II X3 710, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
