Xeon E3110 vs Core 2 Duo E6850

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6850
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.71

Xeon E3110 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6850 by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Xeon E3110 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26932618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency1.031.14
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)no data
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Xeon E3110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads2no data
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHzno data
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L3 cacheno data6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.3625V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Xeon E3110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socketno dataLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Xeon E3110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Xeon E3110 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Xeon E3110 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6850 0.71
Xeon E3110 0.78
+9.9%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6850 1130
Xeon E3110 1242
+9.9%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo E6850 332
Xeon E3110 388
+16.9%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo E6850 559
Xeon E3110 648
+15.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 0.78
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm

Xeon E3110 has a 9.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Xeon E3110.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6850 is a desktop processor while Xeon E3110 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Xeon E3110, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6850
Core 2 Duo E6850
Intel Xeon E3110
Xeon E3110

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 73 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 38 votes

Rate Xeon E3110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6850 or Xeon E3110, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.