Pentium G4500 vs Core 2 Duo E6850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6850
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.72
Pentium G4500
2015
2 cores / 2 threads, 51 Watt
1.75
+143%

Pentium G4500 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6850 by a whopping 143% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Pentium G4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking26982033
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.31
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)Intel Pentium
Power efficiency1.053.27
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release dateno data1 September 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Pentium G4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rate1333 MHz4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache64 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache4 MB256K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm14 nm
Die size143 mm2150 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data65 °C
Number of transistors291 million1,400 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Pentium G4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket7751151
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt51 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Pentium G4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Pentium G4500 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Pentium G4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3, DDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 530

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Pentium G4500.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6850 0.72
Pentium G4500 1.75
+143%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6850 1150
Pentium G4500 2799
+143%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo E6850 332
Pentium G4500 705
+112%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo E6850 559
Pentium G4500 1142
+104%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 1.75
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 51 Watt

Pentium G4500 has a 143.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 27.5% lower power consumption.

The Pentium G4500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6850 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Pentium G4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6850
Core 2 Duo E6850
Intel Pentium G4500
Pentium G4500

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 74 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 155 votes

Rate Pentium G4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6850 or Pentium G4500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.