Celeron 827 vs Core 2 Duo E6850

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Celeron 827 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2697not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)Intel Celeron
Power efficiency1.04no data
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release dateno datano data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Celeron 827 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed3 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rate1333 MHz4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data14
L1 cache64 KB64 KB
L2 cache4 MB256 KB
L3 cache0 KB1.5 MB
Chip lithography65 nm32 nm
Die size143 mm2131 mm2
Number of transistors291 million504 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Celeron 827 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
Socket775no data
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Celeron 827. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Celeron 827 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6850 and Celeron 827. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3-1333
Maximum memory sizeno data16 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data21.335 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 17 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6850 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Celeron 827, on the other hand, has a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 282.4% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Celeron 827. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6850 is a desktop processor while Celeron 827 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6850 and Celeron 827, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6850
Core 2 Duo E6850
Intel Celeron 827
Celeron 827

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 73 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6850 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron 827 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6850 or Celeron 827, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.