Phenom II X4 805 vs Core 2 Duo E6750

VS

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E6750
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.64
Phenom II X4 805
2009
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.23
+92.2%

Phenom II X4 805 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6750 by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6750 and Phenom II X4 805 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27572304
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.06
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.931.23
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Deneb (2009−2011)
Release dateJuly 2007 (17 years ago)9 February 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$174

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6750 and Phenom II X4 805 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rate1333 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB128 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Die size143 mm2258 mm2
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
Number of transistors291 million758 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.5Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6750 and Phenom II X4 805 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketPLGA775AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Phenom II X4 805. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E6750 and Phenom II X4 805 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Phenom II X4 805 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Phenom II X4 805. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E6750 and Phenom II X4 805.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E6750 0.64
Phenom II X4 805 1.23
+92.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6750 1012
Phenom II X4 805 1959
+93.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 1.23
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6750 has 46.2% lower power consumption.

Phenom II X4 805, on the other hand, has a 92.2% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Phenom II X4 805 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6750 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6750 and Phenom II X4 805, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Core 2 Duo E6750
AMD Phenom II X4 805
Phenom II X4 805

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 211 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 33 votes

Rate Phenom II X4 805 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6750 or Phenom II X4 805, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.