Pentium D 840 vs Core 2 Duo E6700

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium D 840 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2790not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.90no data
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Smithfield (2005)
Release dateno dataMay 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium D 840 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHzno data
L1 cache64 KB28 KB
L2 cache4 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm90 nm
Die size143 mm2206 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data70 °C
Number of transistors291 million169 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.2V-1.4V

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium D 840 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket775PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt130 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium D 840. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium D 840 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium D 840 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Pentium D 840. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 130 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6700 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Pentium D 840. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Pentium D 840, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Core 2 Duo E6700
Intel Pentium D 840
Pentium D 840

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 82 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 9 votes

Rate Pentium D 840 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6700 or Pentium D 840, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.