Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ vs Core 2 Duo E6700

VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2768not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)Mobile Athlon 64
Power efficiency0.91no data
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Oakville (2003−2004)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)August 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus rate1066 MHz800 MHz
L1 cacheno data128K
L2 cacheno data512K
Chip lithography65 nmno data
Die sizeno data193 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data754
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo (Desktop) E6700 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6700 990
+125%
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ 440

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Core 2 Duo E6700 has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6700 is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 2800+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Core 2 Duo E6700
AMD Mobile Athlon 64 2800+
Mobile Athlon 64 2800+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 82 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Mobile Athlon 64 2800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6700 or Mobile Athlon 64 2800+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.