Athlon X2 QL-64 vs Core 2 Duo E6700

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon X2 QL-64 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2708not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)2x AMD Athlon
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Lion (2008−2009)
Release dateno data1 January 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon X2 QL-64 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.66 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus support1066 MHz3600 MHz
L1 cacheno data256 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon X2 QL-64 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno dataS1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon X2 QL-64. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization
PowerNowno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon X2 QL-64 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E6700 990
+59.2%
Athlon X2 QL-64 622

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Core 2 Duo E6700 320
+59.2%
Athlon X2 QL-64 201

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Core 2 Duo E6700 546
+42.2%
Athlon X2 QL-64 384

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Core 2 Duo E6700 2710
+68%
Athlon X2 QL-64 1614

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Core 2 Duo E6700 5110
+58.6%
Athlon X2 QL-64 3223

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Core 2 Duo E6700 2354
+60.4%
Athlon X2 QL-64 1468

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon X2 QL-64 has 85.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon X2 QL-64. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Core 2 Duo E6700 is a desktop processor while Athlon X2 QL-64 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6700 and Athlon X2 QL-64, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6700
Core 2 Duo E6700
AMD Athlon X2 QL-64
Athlon X2 QL-64

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 81 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E6700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 37 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-64 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6700 or Athlon X2 QL-64, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.