Sempron 3000+ vs Core 2 Duo E6600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E6600 and Sempron 3000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking2674not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.46no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesCore 2 Duo (Desktop)no data
Architecture codenameConroe (2006−2007)Palermo (2001)
Release dateno data1 October 2005 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$50
Current price$30 $55 (1.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E6600 and Sempron 3000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz1.8 GHz
Bus support1066 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data128 KB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Die sizeno data144 mm2
Number of transistorsno data63 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E6600 and Sempron 3000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data939
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt62 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6600 and Sempron 3000+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Core 2 Duo E6600 919
+221%
Sempron 3000+ 286

Core 2 Duo E6600 outperforms Sempron 3000+ by 221% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 62 Watt

We couldn't decide between Core 2 Duo E6600 and Sempron 3000+. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6600 and Sempron 3000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E6600
Core 2 Duo E6600
AMD Sempron 3000+
Sempron 3000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 385 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo E6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 79 votes

Rate Sempron 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E6600 or Sempron 3000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.