Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Core 2 Duo E6320
Aggregate performance score
Core 2 Duo E6320 outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 181% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon 64 TF-20 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2945 | 3300 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 0.65 | 0.61 |
| Architecture codename | Conroe (2006−2007) | Sherman (2009) |
| Release date | April 2007 (17 years ago) | 1 May 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon 64 TF-20 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 1.86 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1066 MHz | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB | 0.1 MB |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 143 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 60 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 291 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.5V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon 64 TF-20 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | PLGA775 | S1g1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon 64 TF-20. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon 64 TF-20 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon 64 TF-20 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon 64 TF-20. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.45 | 0.16 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Core 2 Duo E6320 has a 181.3% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Athlon 64 TF-20, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.
The Core 2 Duo E6320 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.
Note that Core 2 Duo E6320 is a desktop processor while Athlon 64 TF-20 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E6320 and Athlon 64 TF-20, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
