Atom D525 vs Celeron T3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T3500 and Atom D525 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameno dataPinetrail (2009−2010)
Release date1 July 2010 (14 years ago)21 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$63
Current priceno data$320 (5.1x MSRP)

Detailed specifications

Celeron T3500 and Atom D525 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speedno data1.83 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data66 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T3500 and Atom D525 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPGA478FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T3500 and Atom D525. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data-
Thermal Monitoringno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data32 Bit
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Celeron T3500 and Atom D525 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T3500 and Atom D525 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T3500 and Atom D525. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
ECC memory supportno data-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA 3150

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron T3500 756
+89%
Atom D525 400

Celeron T3500 outperforms Atom D525 by 89% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron T3500 236
+211%
Atom D525 76

Celeron T3500 outperforms Atom D525 by 211% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron T3500 350
+87.2%
Atom D525 187

Celeron T3500 outperforms Atom D525 by 87% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 13 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron T3500 and Atom D525. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T3500 and Atom D525, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T3500
Celeron T3500
Intel Atom D525
Atom D525

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 8 votes

Rate Celeron T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 187 votes

Rate Atom D525 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T3500 or Atom D525, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.