Ryzen 5 6600H vs Celeron SU2300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated590
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Architecture codenameno dataRembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$22 no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data6 (Hexa-Core)
Threadsno data12
Base clock speed1.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data4.5 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache1 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketBGA956FP7
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Celeron SU2300 482
Ryzen 5 6600H 18912
+3824%

Ryzen 5 6600H outperforms Celeron SU2300 by 3824% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron SU2300 160
Ryzen 5 6600H 1799
+1024%

Ryzen 5 6600H outperforms Celeron SU2300 by 1024% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Celeron SU2300 278
Ryzen 5 6600H 7400
+2562%

Ryzen 5 6600H outperforms Celeron SU2300 by 2562% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 45 Watt

We couldn't decide between Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron SU2300 and Ryzen 5 6600H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron SU2300
Celeron SU2300
AMD Ryzen 5 6600H
Ryzen 5 6600H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Celeron SU2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 669 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 6600H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron SU2300 or Ryzen 5 6600H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.