3 100HL vs Celeron SU2300
Aggregate performance score
Core 3 100HL outperforms Celeron SU2300 by a whopping 3750% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3376 | 878 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.10 | 9.40 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | no data | Raptor Lake-PS (2024) |
| Release date | 1 July 2009 (16 years ago) | 8 April 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Celeron SU2300 and Core 3 100HL basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 1 MB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron SU2300 and Core 3 100HL compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | BGA956 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron SU2300 and Core 3 100HL. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| TSX | - | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Security technologies
Celeron SU2300 and Core 3 100HL technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron SU2300 and Core 3 100HL are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron SU2300 and Core 3 100HL. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Iris Xe Graphics 48EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron SU2300 and Core 3 100HL.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.26 | 10.01 |
| Recency | 1 July 2009 | 8 April 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 10 Watt | 45 Watt |
Celeron SU2300 has 350% lower power consumption.
3 100HL, on the other hand, has a 3750% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Core 3 100HL is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Celeron SU2300 in performance tests.
Be aware that Celeron SU2300 is a notebook processor while Core 3 100HL is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
